Most AI services are prompt engineering with a strategy deck stapled on. We build systems that prove their own numbers and measure their own return, designed around how your business actually works.
Start a conversationBefore anything gets automated, we measure what the current way of working actually costs you: the time it takes, the handoffs it needs, and the errors that surface late. Not from a survey or a workshop, but from how the work already runs. A starting point you can verify is what makes the improvement believable later, to you and to anyone you answer to.
You should always be able to ask where a number or a decision came from and get a straight answer. The systems we build show their work. Every output traces back to its source, every step can be checked, and when the system is not confident it says so and hands off to a person rather than guessing. Output that looks authoritative but cannot be traced is not an asset. It is a liability.
The way your team already works, the artifacts they produce and the shape of the final deliverable, is the specification we build to. We fit the system to your process instead of bending your process around a tool. Done well, the change feels like the work got faster, not like everything got replaced.
Real work takes more than a clever prompt. It takes the right models and tools wired together, memory of what happened before, and enough context to choose the next step correctly, run after run, without drifting. Coordinating agents, tools, memory and context is the discipline behind the name, and it is where most AI efforts quietly come apart.
The relevant question is not where the experience happened. It is whether the person designing your system has run into its failure points before. Most of them by hand, years before they could be automated.
Primary company research at fifty calls a day, extracting data by hand. Fund accounting, auditor-grade valuations, reconciliation and tie-outs. Database architecture and venture data at scale. The extraction work AI now automates, done by hand first.
Financial modeling, risk and valuation, derivatives and structured finance. Underwriting, diligence, portfolio management, investment judgment. Orchestrating analyst teams and turning methodology into repeatable process. Agent orchestration is the same problem with different labor.
Search marketing with measured ROI, and the habit of proving a change worked before calling it a win. Brand, design and copywriting. Fundraising, LP relationships, governance. Founder through to an M&A exit. How output earns confidence and reaches the people who act on it.
The long version, with all forty-six skills mapped across the three layers, is at ericwoo.ai.
Knowing that a number is wrong takes knowing the domain. That only holds where the experience is real, so the list stays tight.
Family offices, funds of funds and institutional allocators carrying document-heavy back offices: capital account statements, fund financials, schedules of investments, capital calls and distributions. Reconciliation is the product, not a feature of it.
GPs preparing for institutional LPs, and firms whose portfolio monitoring is still rebuilt in a spreadsheet every quarter.
Founders who need investor narrative, data-room architecture and reporting that survives diligence, well before they can justify hiring for it.
Restaurants, service firms and owner-operated businesses. The least-served segment and often the highest measurable return, because the current baseline is entirely manual. No prior AI fluency assumed or required.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether this is a fit. If it is not, I will say so.
Start a conversation